Saturday, April 1, 2017

Arkansas can’t find enough volunteers to witness back-to-back executions

Sponsored by  E-book Vault - Free E-book's
=>

(CNN)Over the course of 10 days in April, Arkansas plans to put to death eight inmates.

The state code requires that no fewer than six "respectable citizens" be present at each execution.
There's one problem: It's having a hard time finding enough volunteers to witness them.
    The volunteer pool is apparently thin enough that state Department of Corrections Director Wendy Kelley invited members of a local Rotary Club to volunteer.
    "Temporarily, there was a little laugh from the audience because they thought she might be kidding," Bill Booker, acting president of the Little Rock Rotary Club, told CNN affiliate FOX16. "It quickly became obvious that she was not kidding."
    Kelley's "informal efforts" continue, the department told CNN on Friday.
    "We remain confident in our ability to carry out these sentences," spokesman Solomon Graves said.

    Who watches executions?

    The people who are allowed to witness an execution vary by state, said Robert Dunham, director of the Death Penalty Information Center in Washington, D.C.
    Typically, family members of the inmate and relatives of the victims are present, he said. Sometimes, a state requires that lay people who have no stake in the case are present, too.
    That could be a member of the media or a citizen witness, such as in Arkansas.
    The Arkansas Code doesn't require that witnesses vary from execution to execution.
    So, it's conceivable that some of the volunteers could witness more than one, Dunham said.
    "It's not natural watching the intentional taking of a human life," he said. "It has an emotional impact on people."
    And witnessing multiple execution more than just doubles the impact, he said.
    "It increases exponentially."

    One obstacle at a time

    The eight death row inmates will be put to death between April 17 and April 27, a move that death penalty opponents have called "unprecedented."
    The series of execution has been attributed to the state's soon-to-be-expire supply of midazolam, a contentious drug that's been blamed for a spate of botched executions in recent years.
    The executions would mark the first time since 2005 that Arkansas has put an inmate to death.

    More From this publisher : HERE

    =>
    ***********************************************
    Read More Here: Arkansas can’t find enough volunteers to witness back-to-back executions
    ************************************
    =>

    This article was searched, compiled, delivered and presented using  RSS Masher 

    =>>


    Arkansas can’t find enough volunteers to witness back-to-back executions was originally posted by Viral News 2

    Hillary Clinton, it’s too soon

    Sponsored by  E-book Vault - Free E-book's
    =>

    (CNN)Hillary Clinton is back.

    Of course, Hillary Clinton is back. I am convinced she will run for the presidency as many times as it takes to win -- even if she is still being wheeled through the streets of Iowa at 108, kept alive by robotics and a refusal to surrender.
    She came to Georgetown University on Friday to give a speech to some fans, and delivered a stinging attack on Donald Trump's budget. Clinton is great at attacking others, dreadful at selling herself. This is a presidential candidate who was beaten first by a man who they said couldn't win -- because he was black -- and then by a man who they said shouldn't win -- because he was Donald Trump.
      And even though the shock of Trump's election victory is receding as we become more involved in just how bad he is at governing, for Clinton it will never ebb as the most stunning rebuke possible. Hillary Clinton was beaten by Donald J Trump. That is like losing the Oscar for best picture to "Police Academy VI." After that kind of humiliation, most people would quit politics and go live in a cabin. Not Hillary. She still needs us to remember who she is.

      Hillary Clinton: Reporter patronized by Spicer

      MUST WATCH

      This is typical of politicians. To succeed in this game you need to be sensitive enough to need to be loved but shallow enough to weather the hate. Trump is an extreme version of this. He appears to feel criticism deeply and yet he also invites it. Perhaps it's better to be talked about horribly than not at all.
      A few presidents and presidential candidates have walked away from the office into the sunset, but most try to find a second life. Nixon was rarely out of the public eye. Bill Clinton started a foundation and amassed a fortune in speaker's fees. Bob Dole did an ad for Viagra.
      And, really, what's wrong with this? Like Hillary, these statesmen all have experience to share, wisdom to impart. As the country sails into uncertain waters under Captain Trump, doesn't it make sense to stop and listen to the views of Hillary Clinton -- an intellectually gifted former secretary of state, no less?
      No. In this instance, no. And the reason is quite simply that it's too soon. Too soon since Hillary Clinton lost the election and gave the White House to Trump -- because, regardless of what strengths Trump might have had, 2016 was ultimately an election for the Democrats to lose.

      Biden: Here's why Clinton lost

      MUST WATCH

      I have no doubt that almost any other candidate could have beaten Trump. Bernie Sanders, Joe Biden, Alec Baldwin, Big Bird. It turns out that the one candidate who could lose was Hillary.
      Yet she insisted on running. Insisted that the party machine back her. Insisted on mounting a grimly negative campaign against her opponent that most probably backfired. Now she has reportedly signed back on with the speaker's bureau that handled her richly compensated appearances before the election. My question is: Why would anyone pay to see a speech given by her?! It would be as perverse as paying Trump to give a lecture on university governance.
      There is a post-politics role for Clinton, but it cannot be just yet. Her party needs a period in which to separate from her memory -- to rebuild, find new candidates, reestablish its identity and delink itself from the entire Clinton philosophy.
      She might go the route of championing clean politics or could pick up the mantle of class war, for it can't be long before Trump's voters notice that his proposed tax cuts are so generous to the rich. Whatever the Democrats look like in the future, Hillary Clinton cannot be permitted to capture the conversation and distract the press. America needs to move on. She needs to pause and reflect.

      More From this publisher : HERE

      =>
      ***********************************************
      Read More Here: Hillary Clinton, it’s too soon
      ************************************
      =>

      This article was searched, compiled, delivered and presented using  BuletViralTraffic 

      =>>


      Hillary Clinton, it’s too soon was originally posted by Viral News 2

      Arkansas can’t find enough volunteers to witness back-to-back executions

      Sponsored by  FreePLRArticles.biz 
      =>

      (CNN)Over the course of 10 days in April, Arkansas plans to put to death eight inmates.

      The state code requires that no fewer than six "respectable citizens" be present at each execution.
      There's one problem: It's having a hard time finding enough volunteers to witness them.
        The volunteer pool is apparently thin enough that state Department of Corrections Director Wendy Kelley invited members of a local Rotary Club to volunteer.
        "Temporarily, there was a little laugh from the audience because they thought she might be kidding," Bill Booker, acting president of the Little Rock Rotary Club, told CNN affiliate FOX16. "It quickly became obvious that she was not kidding."
        Kelley's "informal efforts" continue, the department told CNN on Friday.
        "We remain confident in our ability to carry out these sentences," spokesman Solomon Graves said.

        Who watches executions?

        The people who are allowed to witness an execution vary by state, said Robert Dunham, director of the Death Penalty Information Center in Washington, D.C.
        Typically, family members of the inmate and relatives of the victims are present, he said. Sometimes, a state requires that lay people who have no stake in the case are present, too.
        That could be a member of the media or a citizen witness, such as in Arkansas.
        The Arkansas Code doesn't require that witnesses vary from execution to execution.
        So, it's conceivable that some of the volunteers could witness more than one, Dunham said.
        "It's not natural watching the intentional taking of a human life," he said. "It has an emotional impact on people."
        And witnessing multiple execution more than just doubles the impact, he said.
        "It increases exponentially."

        One obstacle at a time

        The eight death row inmates will be put to death between April 17 and April 27, a move that death penalty opponents have called "unprecedented."
        The series of execution has been attributed to the state's soon-to-be-expire supply of midazolam, a contentious drug that's been blamed for a spate of botched executions in recent years.
        The executions would mark the first time since 2005 that Arkansas has put an inmate to death.

        More From this publisher : HERE

        =>
        ***********************************************
        Original Post Here: Arkansas can’t find enough volunteers to witness back-to-back executions
        ************************************
        =>

        This article was searched, compiled, delivered and presented using  TrendingTraffic 

        =>>


        Arkansas can’t find enough volunteers to witness back-to-back executions was originally posted by Viral News 2

        Hillary Clinton, it’s too soon

        Sponsored by  SmartQuotes - Your daily smart quote 
        =>

        (CNN)Hillary Clinton is back.

        Of course, Hillary Clinton is back. I am convinced she will run for the presidency as many times as it takes to win -- even if she is still being wheeled through the streets of Iowa at 108, kept alive by robotics and a refusal to surrender.
        She came to Georgetown University on Friday to give a speech to some fans, and delivered a stinging attack on Donald Trump's budget. Clinton is great at attacking others, dreadful at selling herself. This is a presidential candidate who was beaten first by a man who they said couldn't win -- because he was black -- and then by a man who they said shouldn't win -- because he was Donald Trump.
          And even though the shock of Trump's election victory is receding as we become more involved in just how bad he is at governing, for Clinton it will never ebb as the most stunning rebuke possible. Hillary Clinton was beaten by Donald J Trump. That is like losing the Oscar for best picture to "Police Academy VI." After that kind of humiliation, most people would quit politics and go live in a cabin. Not Hillary. She still needs us to remember who she is.

          Hillary Clinton: Reporter patronized by Spicer

          MUST WATCH

          This is typical of politicians. To succeed in this game you need to be sensitive enough to need to be loved but shallow enough to weather the hate. Trump is an extreme version of this. He appears to feel criticism deeply and yet he also invites it. Perhaps it's better to be talked about horribly than not at all.
          A few presidents and presidential candidates have walked away from the office into the sunset, but most try to find a second life. Nixon was rarely out of the public eye. Bill Clinton started a foundation and amassed a fortune in speaker's fees. Bob Dole did an ad for Viagra.
          And, really, what's wrong with this? Like Hillary, these statesmen all have experience to share, wisdom to impart. As the country sails into uncertain waters under Captain Trump, doesn't it make sense to stop and listen to the views of Hillary Clinton -- an intellectually gifted former secretary of state, no less?
          No. In this instance, no. And the reason is quite simply that it's too soon. Too soon since Hillary Clinton lost the election and gave the White House to Trump -- because, regardless of what strengths Trump might have had, 2016 was ultimately an election for the Democrats to lose.

          Biden: Here's why Clinton lost

          MUST WATCH

          I have no doubt that almost any other candidate could have beaten Trump. Bernie Sanders, Joe Biden, Alec Baldwin, Big Bird. It turns out that the one candidate who could lose was Hillary.
          Yet she insisted on running. Insisted that the party machine back her. Insisted on mounting a grimly negative campaign against her opponent that most probably backfired. Now she has reportedly signed back on with the speaker's bureau that handled her richly compensated appearances before the election. My question is: Why would anyone pay to see a speech given by her?! It would be as perverse as paying Trump to give a lecture on university governance.
          There is a post-politics role for Clinton, but it cannot be just yet. Her party needs a period in which to separate from her memory -- to rebuild, find new candidates, reestablish its identity and delink itself from the entire Clinton philosophy.
          She might go the route of championing clean politics or could pick up the mantle of class war, for it can't be long before Trump's voters notice that his proposed tax cuts are so generous to the rich. Whatever the Democrats look like in the future, Hillary Clinton cannot be permitted to capture the conversation and distract the press. America needs to move on. She needs to pause and reflect.

          More From this publisher : HERE

          =>
          ***********************************************
          Post Source Here: Hillary Clinton, it’s too soon
          ************************************
          =>

          This article was searched, compiled, delivered and presented using  TrendingTraffic 

          =>>


          Hillary Clinton, it’s too soon was originally posted by Viral News 2

          It’s April Fools’ Day, not week, and this madness needs to stop

          Why China is banning beards and veils in Xinjiang

          Sponsored by  FreePLRArticles.biz 
          =>

          (CNN)No long beards. No veils in public places. No home-schooling.

          The latest measures -- outlined in a sweeping new anti-extremism legislation -- take effect Saturday and come on the heels of a series of steps to increase surveillance in the region that include the surrender of passports and mandatory GPS trackers in cars.
          "They're doubling down on security in Xinjiang," said James Leibold, an associate professor at Australia's Le Trobe University, whose research focuses on China's Uyghur minority.

            What are the latest measures?

            The new legislation, which was published on a regional news portal run by the provincial government, appears to standardize, and expand across the whole province, piecemeal rules and regulations that have been enacted in individual towns and cities.
            Specifically, it prohibits:
            • Advocating or propagating extremist thoughts
            • Wearing or forcing others to wear full-face coverings
            • Hyping up religious fanaticism through growing beards or choosing names in an abnormal way
            • Not allowing children to receive state education, interfering with state education;
            • Deliberately interfering or harming the implementation of family planning policies;
            • Publishing, downloading or reading articles, publications and audio-video material containing extremist content;
            • Rejecting or refusing state products and services that include radio and television programming.
            The law didn't explain these measures in detail or define abnormal, but the English-language state-run China Daily did say that long beards would be banned "as they are deemed to promote extremism."

            Why is China so concerned?

            Hundreds of people have been killed in Xinjiang in recent years; the government describes the perpetrators as terrorists inspired by religious extremism.
            There has been a spate of high-profile attacks involving ethnic Uyghurs, a Turkic-speaking minority, outside the province.
            These include a 2014 attack outside a rail station in the southwestern city of Kunming that killed 31 people, and an attack in Beijing in 2013 when a car drove into a crowd of tourists and killed five people.
            In March, President Xi Jinping called for a "great wall of iron" to safeguard the region's stability.
            Xinjiang, a resource-rich province, plays a key role in the "One Belt, One Road" initiative championed by Xi. The project aims to improve economic ties with central Asia and Xi wants no disruption to a landmark international conference he is holding on it in May.
            "We'd be foolish to deny that China has a problem with terrorists," Leibold told CNN.
            "But I think the Communist Party is exaggerating the threat of radical Islam and they are turning up the heat in assimilating the Uyghurs into the Chinese nation state."

            Who are the Uyghurs?

            The Uyghurs are largely Muslims, who are the dominant ethnic group in Xinjiang, a large autonomous region that borders Russia, Mongolia, central and south Asia.
            Uyghurs regard themselves as linguistically, culturally and ethnically close to central Asia, despite a long history of Chinese rule.
            Tensions have arisen between Uyghurs and the Han, the predominant ethnic group in China, who have migrated to Xinjiang in large numbers over the past 60 years.
            A 2011 report by the US Congressional-Executive Commission on China said that Han workers have taken most of the new jobs and unemployment among Uyghurs is high. Activists say China has been taking measures to undermine the Uyghur language, culture and religious practices including restrictions on observing Ramadan.
            In a response to a question on whether the Chinese government was seeking to repress the Muslim faith in Xinjiang, Lu Kang, China's foreign ministry spokesman said on Wednesday that "the objective fact is that the people of all ethnicities in Xinjiang, just like the people living in other regions of China, are enjoying better lives, working conditions and brighter prospect for development."
            "We oppose the approach of linking terrorism with a certain ethnicity or a certain religion," he added.
            Leibold said the government has been slowly increasing measures since July 2009, when some 200 people were killed in ethnic riots that were prompted by long-simmering resentment many Uyghurs have for the Han.

            Are there Uyghur terror groups?

            Beijing has blamed the violence on Islamic militants, led by the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM), which the US State Department listed as a terrorist organization in 2002 a year after the September 11 attacks.
            But many analysts dispute its characterization as an Al Qaeda or ISIS-style group.
            In February, a 28-minute video analyzed by the SITE Intelligence Group appeared to show Uyghur militants threatening to return to China to "shed blood like rivers." SITE said it was produced by ISIS.

            Human rights group slams China's crackdown

            MUST WATCH

            When asked about the video, China's Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said he wasn't aware of it, but said: "East Turkestan terrorist forces represented by the East Turkestan Islamic Movement pose a grave threat on security and stability of China and the region."
            The China Daily, a state-run newspaper published an editorial that went further: "the video lends further credence to Beijing's claim, especially the oft-ignored assertions of links between domestic and foreign terrorist elements."
            China has long asserted Uyghur fighters have joined the ranks of ISIS in Syria and Iraq. New America, a US think tank, estimates that 100 Uyghurs having gone abroad to fight for the ISIS cause, while the state-run Global Times put the figure at about 300.

            How do people in Xinjiang feel about this?

            The Chinese government tightly controls access to the area.
            Journalists are closely monitored when in the province, and sometimes are prohibited from accessing certain parts of the region all together. The same applies for non governmental organizations.
            Leibold says the new security measures drive resentment underground and widens the gulf of misunderstanding and between the Chinese state and Uyghurs.
            "This is an example of a surveillance society that we've never seen across China," he said.
            However, not all Xinjiang residents see Beijing's security build-up as a problem.
            "I don't think they're restrictions," a 30-year-old Uyghur woman in Xinjiang's Manasi County told CNN earlier this month on the condition of anonymity because she's not authorized to speak to media by her employer. "I think the government is doing its job."
            She said while she's noticed a steady influx of ethnic Han Chinese move into the region over the years, but she hasn't felt discriminated -- either in the Chinese school she attended or in her job as a nurse.
            She added she didn't mind attending the mandatory weekly flag raising ceremony, because it's the same thing she did in school growing up, and thinks installing GPS in vehicles and other surveillance devices is for the greater good.
            Dolkun Isa, Secretary General of the World Uyghur Congress (WUC), an exile group based in Germany, said that Chinese news coverage focuses on violence perpetrated by a tiny fraction of the population and "this shapes how some view Uyghurs generally -- though clearly unfairly."

            More From this publisher : HERE

            =>
            ***********************************************
            See Full Article Here: Why China is banning beards and veils in Xinjiang
            ************************************
            =>

            This article was searched, compiled, delivered and presented using  RSS Masher 

            =>>


            Why China is banning beards and veils in Xinjiang was originally posted by Viral News 2

            Tourist breaks famous Dinnie Stones lifting record at Potarch – BBC News