Wednesday, May 30, 2018

John McCain in New Book: Im Freer Now to Speak My Mind

Everything Facebook launched at F8 and Why

Day 1 of Facebook’s F8 conference was packed with announcements and updates. Here are 10 big takeaways from Mark Zuckerberg’s keynote on Day 1. You can find full coverage and analysis of F8 here. 

1. FaceDate

Facebook is launching a dating feature where you can volunteer to make a profile that’s only visible to non-friends who’ve also opted in to looking for love. Facebook will match you based on all its data, and messaging will happen in a dedicated inbox rather than Messenger.

Why: If Facebook wants to drive “meaningful connections,” it doesn’t get more meaningful than introducing you to your life partner. Facebook will have to be careful to keep everything private, as people already think it’s creepy or uncool. But investors love it, considering Tinder parent company Match Group’s share price fell 22 percent today.

2. “Clear History”

Facebook is building Clear History, a new privacy feature allowing users to delete data Facebook has collected from sites and apps that use its ads and analytics tool. This means you can scrub some of your browsing history from Facebook’s data store. Mark Zuckerberg likened this to deleting cookies from your browser history. It’s a nice gesture to the privacy-conscious, though it’ll make your Facebook experience less personalized.

Why: Zuckerberg faced tons of questions from Congress about data it collects from around the web. Users were pissed to learn they had little control over it. Clear History could quiet some cries for regulation.

3. Instagram video chat and anti-bullying

Instagram is launching video chat, which TechCrunch scooped in March when we spotted the feature buried in its Android app. Meanwhile, Instagram is also getting a new filter to protect users from bullying comments, plus an improved Explore tab.

Why: Instagram Direct messaging is super popular, but lacked video chat… which is also super popular on Messenger and WhatsApp. Combined with anti-bullying features, Instagram could become a safer and sillier place for teens to hang out — which is just what Facebook wants to defeat Snapchat.

4. Facebook is reopening its app review process

Facebook will re-open its app review process following the pause it took after the Cambridge Analytica crisis — welcome news for developers.

Why: Facebook couldn’t risk another sketchy app slipping through and selling user data, but it also has to keep developers loyal to its platform so they keep building experiences that attract users. Facebook was wise to balance safety and privacy with new developer capabilities today.

5. Oculus Go goes on sale for $199

Oculus Go, Facebook’s cheap and capable standalone VR headset, is now on sale. It costs $199 for the version with 32GB of onboard storage, and $249 for the 64GB variety.

Why: VR headsets where you have to stick your phone in are clumsy and prevent Facebook from controlling the whole experience. Instead of relying on the Samsung Gear headset shell and your iPhone or Android, Facebook gets to dictate everything about the perfect VR rig you can strap on first-timers.

6. Messenger simplifies and starts translation 

Facebook is tiptoeing into translation of chat threads in Messenger, starting with English-Spanish convos in the U.S. within Marketplace. Meanwhile, Facebook is stripping out the camera and games tab to give Messenger a cleaner design.

Why: Translation could deliver on the Facebook promise of bringing the world closer together by eradicating language barriers and letting people realize how much they have in common. But Messenger was getting way too bloated with so many new features, so the simplification should let the actually useful ones shine.

7. Introducing VR Memories and 3D photos 

Facebook is bringing 3D illustrations and models to the News Feed. It’s also going to turn 2D photos into VR memories — 3D environments you can explore using a trippy point cloud design.

Why: Facebook wants to stay ahead of the content trends and be the home of future formats. They might seem like a novelty today, but at least they keep Facebook interesting.

8. WhatsApp hits 450 million stories users 

WhatsApp’s Snapchat Stories clone WhatsApp Status now has 450 million daily active users. That’s well over 2X the user count of Snapchat’s whole app. And WhatsApp is also adding stickers and group video calling.

Why: This is a big deal because Snapchat had a disastrous earnings call today where it sank to its slowest user growth rate ever, while WhatsApp Status continues its explosive growth. Snapchat neglected the international market at first, and now WhatsApp has beaten it to the punch worldwide.

9. Sharing to Facebook and Instagram Stories from other apps

Starting with Spotify, SoundCloud and GoPro, other apps can share photos and videos directly to Stories inside Facebook and Instagram.

Why: Facebook wants to make its Stories more interesting than Snapchat’s. And this new wing of the platform could create a massive opportunity for music discovery, the likes of which we haven’t seen since Myspace.

10. Oculus TV

Oculus wants you to watch TV inside its new Go headset. At first you’ll get Facebook Watch, but expect apps like Netflix and Hulu to arrive eventually.

Why: There just aren’t enough great VR experiences, but perhaps Facebook can get people spending more time in their headsets by creating a virtual big screen for 2D content.

For more of TechCrunch’s F8 coverage, check out all our stories:

Original Article : HERE ; This post was curated & posted using : RealSpecific

=>
***********************************************
Post Source Here: Everything Facebook launched at F8 and Why
************************************
=>

Sponsored by  FreePLRArticles.biz 

=>

This article was searched, compiled, delivered and presented using  RSS Masher  & TrendingTraffic  

=>>


Everything Facebook launched at F8 and Why was originally posted by Viral News 2

After a lawyer’s racist rant went viral, a mariachi band showed up outside his apartment.

Aaron Schlossberg may not lose his license to practice law, but he still has had to face the music.

After being caught on camera in a threatening and racist rant against restaurant employees who were speaking Spanish, critics are calling for the New York attorney to lose his ability to practice law.

While that's unlikely to happen, he's still endured real consequences of losing his office space, generating a ton of one-star Yelp reviews, and facing an avalanche of very public criticism from a united Latinx community and countless allies who are saying "no" to his xenophobic rant.

The public's response sends a powerful message that New Yorkers won't tolerate racism.

That response culminated when a group of local activists organized a community event, highlighted by a mariachi band that played music like "La Cucaracha" outside Schlossberg's Manhattan apartment.

New York City residents have loudly responded by saying there's no place for racism and intolerance in their city.

And they're weighing in with their wallets, too. A GoFundMe campaign launched to raise $500 for the mariachi band raised more than twice that amount in just a few hours. In fact, the band reportedly offered to perform for free, and some of the extra funds were used to bring food to the event.

The GoFundMe organizers quickly cut off the donations button and instead asked those who wanted to help to contribute directly to The Immigrant Defense Project, a nonprofit that helps provide legal counsel and representation for undocumented people facing deportation.

The message of unity that arose from the incident is important.

It might be more immediately satisfying to see Schlossberg punished for his outlandish behavior, but sending a powerful message of unity in response is likely to have a greater impact than any professional consequences endured by one bad apple.

This incident is a good reminder that the United States has no official language. While most Americans consider English their primary language, as the saying goes: We are still a nation of immigrants, even if the current administration thinks otherwise.

People are angry, and that's understandable. But a response like this will have a lasting impact.

Schlossberg used his privilege to threaten and demean others without provocation. We still don't even know if the employees were citizens, immigrants, or undocumented. And in the most fundamental way, it does not matter.

They were simply doing their jobs like most of us do on any given day. Everyone has to eat, and most of us have to work.

That's why the overwhelming response to Schlossberg is far more important than his heinous act itself. A message of inclusion, unity, and tolerance is winning out, and it's one that won't be ignored.

Original Article : HERE ; This post was curated & posted using : RealSpecific

=>
***********************************************
Originally Published Here: After a lawyer’s racist rant went viral, a mariachi band showed up outside his apartment.
************************************
=>

Sponsored by  SmartQuotes - Your daily smart quote 

=>

This article was searched, compiled, delivered and presented using  RSS Masher  & TrendingTraffic  

=>>


After a lawyer’s racist rant went viral, a mariachi band showed up outside his apartment. was originally posted by Viral News 2

Blac Chyna May Be Pregnant With Her Barely Legal Beau’s Baby & Twitter Has A LOT Of Thoughts On The Matter!

Whoa, whoa, whoa. Could Blac Chyna be pregnant AGAIN??

Over the weekend, reports claimed that the video vixen is expecting a little one with her barely legal beau, YBN Almighty Jay. Per Media Take Out News, the mother of two is already sporting a "two and a half month along baby bump."

Related: Chyna Defends Dream's Pink Hair Extensions!

If — and we are saying if — the reality TV vet is with child, this would be her first kiddo with the 18-year-old rapper. However, the 29-year-old businesswoman is also a mother to Tyga's son, King Cairo, and Rob Kardashian's daughter, Dream Kardashian.

The pregnancy rumors were further fueled thanks to a leopard print hoodie/leggings set by Married To The Mob. Supposedly, the ensem made it seem as though Chyna already had a popped belly. While we're not entirely sold on the supposed evidence, you can take a peek at the pic HERE.

Unsurprisingly, fans have already flocked to Twitter to voice their opinions on the rumor! They wrote:

DAMNNNN. The shade is real, y'all!!

What do YOU think?? Could Chyna be really pregnant by YBN Almighty Jay??

SOUND OFF in the comments (below)!

[Image via Instagram.]

Original Article : HERE ; This post was curated & posted using : RealSpecific

=>
***********************************************
Post Source Here: Blac Chyna May Be Pregnant With Her Barely Legal Beau’s Baby & Twitter Has A LOT Of Thoughts On The Matter!
************************************
=>

Sponsored by  our friends from Met001.biz 

=>

This article was searched, compiled, delivered and presented using  RSS Masher  & TrendingTraffic  

=>>


Blac Chyna May Be Pregnant With Her Barely Legal Beau’s Baby & Twitter Has A LOT Of Thoughts On The Matter! was originally posted by Viral News 2

People Are Calling This Student Racist After She Posts Photos Of Her Prom Dress Online

Ireland voted to end its ban on abortion. Here’s why that’s a win for human rights.

In 1983, the people of Ireland voted to ban abortion. 35 years later, they took to the polls once again, reversing that decision in a landslide victory.

Though abortion was already illegal in Ireland prior to the 1983 vote, social conservatives feared that a court decision could render that law unconstitutional, much like what happened in the United States with the 1977 Roe v. Wade decision. So in 1983, to prevent the chance of court intervention, Ireland held a public referendum, voting to amend the country's constitution and adopting the Eighth Amendment, banning abortion in all situations.

In 2017, in response to public pressure, the government announced plans to put this question up for a vote once again. Citizens of Ireland voted on May 25, 2018, and the referendum to lift the ban on abortions won by an impressive margin.

Protesters demonstrate outside the Irish Embassy in London on September 30, 2017, following the announcement of the May 2018 referendum. Photo by Chris J. Ratcliffe/AFP/Getty Images.

To see the nasty history of the Eighth Amendment, look no further than the story of Savita Halappanavar.

In 2012, 31-year-old Savita Halappanavar went to the hospital 17 weeks pregnant. Her pregnancy had an unforeseen complication, and she was having what's known as a septic abortion or miscarriage. There was virtually no chance that she'd be able to carry the pregnancy to term, but doctors were prohibited from ending the pregnancy. Doctors tried to induce labor, resulting in her delivering a stillborn fetus. It was too late for her, however, as the sepsis had gotten worse. She died four days later.

Though the country implemented a law the following year designed to carve out narrow exceptions to the abortion ban in cases like Halappanavar's, abortion rights advocates argued that nothing short of a full repeal would do. Their opinion is shared by the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights, ruling in 2016 that "the balance that the state party has chosen to strike between protection of the fetus and the rights of the woman in the present case cannot be justified." Other human rights organizations, such as Amnesty International, concur.

Horror stories like Halappanavar's are all too common. In 2007, officials tried to prevent a 17-year-old known as "Miss D" from leaving the country to obtain an abortion after learning that her fetus would not survive birth. In 2014, a teenage asylum-seeker known as "Miss Y" was subjected to borderline inhumane treatment after learning that she was pregnant, eventually undergoing a coerced Caesarian section. These cases aren't about protecting some notion of "life"; they're about control and forcing women to experience absolute nightmare scenarios.

A woman stands in front of a mural inside the Bernard Shaw pub in Dublin, Ireland. Photo by Charles McQuillan/Getty Images.

Bor no ban, abortion has always been accessible for the well-off. The two-tiered nature of this is part of the problem.

Since 1980, 170,000 Irish women have traveled to a foreign country for an abortion, and Ireland makes up nearly 70% of all non-resident abortions in the United Kingdom. Repealing the Eighth Amendment is as much about providing access to all women equally as it is about human rights. Access to health care should not hinge on whether somebody has the time and money to take a multi-day international trip.

A man walks in front of a pro-choice mural in Dun Laoghaire, Ireland, on May 10, 2018. Photo by Artur Widak/AFP/Getty Images.

Though Ireland has voted to repeal the Eighth Amendment, there's still a bit more work to be done before abortion will be legalized — and would still be rife with restrictions.

The next step is for Irish lawmakers to enact new guidelines on abortion. One popular proposal that's been floating around would make abortion legal in all cases during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy. Between 12 and 24 weeks, abortions would be limited to instances where the life of the mother or long-term viability of the fetus were in danger. After 24 weeks, only pregnancies involving fatal fetal abnormalities would qualify for an abortion. Additionally, people seeking abortions would be subject to mandatory counseling and waiting periods.

It's hardly the free-for-all "no" campaigners would have had you believe. It's also short of what "yes" campaigners would hope for. Still, it's a positive step forward for the country, and it will save lives.

A "Yes" canvasser poses for a photo in Dublin on May 12, 2018. Photo by Artur Widak / AFP/Getty Images.

Original Article : HERE ; This post was curated & posted using : RealSpecific

=>
***********************************************
Learn More Here: Ireland voted to end its ban on abortion. Here’s why that’s a win for human rights.
************************************
=>

Sponsored by  FreePLRArticles.biz 

=>

This article was searched, compiled, delivered and presented using  RSS Masher  & TrendingTraffic  

=>>


Ireland voted to end its ban on abortion. Here’s why that’s a win for human rights. was originally posted by Viral News 2

Trump says London hospital is like ‘a war zone’ from knife attacks

(CNN)President Donald Trump compared an unnamed London hospital to a "war zone" on Friday, saying despite tough gun laws in the UK, it has blood all over the floors from victims of knife attacks.

"They don't have guns. They have knives and instead there's blood all over the floors of this hospital," Trump said. "They say it's as bad as a military war zone hospital ... knives, knives, knives. London hasn't been used to that. They're getting used to that. It's pretty tough."

London murder rate surpasses New York

It's unclear what hospital Trump was referring to. But the BBC reported that a trauma surgeon at the Royal London Hospital recently told the network that his fellow doctors have compared it to an Afghan war zone.
    "Some of my military colleagues have described their practice here as being similar to being at (Helmand province's former Camp) Bastion," Dr. Martin Griffiths told the BBC. "We routinely have children under our care -- 13, 14, 15 years old are daily occurrences, knife and gun wounds."
    British media outlets cited his quotes in stories published last month.
    Amid the furor over Trump's comments, Griffiths tweeted Saturday: "Happy to invite Mr Trump to my (prestigious) hospital to meet with our mayor and police commissioner to discuss our successes in violence reduction in London."
    London Mayor Sadiq Khan's office declined to comment to CNN following Trump's remarks.

    Police: London among safest cities in the world

    There have been growing concerns over knife crime after figures last year showed such attacks had reached the highest point in England and Wales since 2011, the earliest date for which comparable data are available.
    It is a particular problem in London, which recorded the highest rate of knife crime per capita of any police force in England and Wales in the year ending March 2017.
    London's Metropolitan Police said last month that it's investigating the cause of the increase in murders,but said the city remains among the safest in the world.
    About 60 suspected murders have been reported in the city so far this year, including assaults and stabbings, the Met Police said Saturday.
    Last year, London had a total of 116 murders, including at least 80 stabbing victims and 10 gunshot victims, police said.
    Police figures show London had 4,700 incidents of knife injuries between April 2017 and March. The previous year's number was 4,446.

    Chicago gun violence

    During his NRA speech, Trump also took aim at Chicago, saying it has tough gun laws but a problem with gun violence.
    "We all know what's going on in Chicago, but Chicago has the toughest gun laws -- they're so tough, but you know what's happening."
    Using that same argument, he asked whether the vans, trucks and cars used in terror attacks should be banned.
    Trump has a history of criticizing London, and has had well-documented spats with its mayor.
    In June, he slammed Khan in a tweet shortly after a terror attack in London. At the time, Khan said he has more important things to do than respond to Trump's "ill-informed tweet," which he described as out-of-context.
    A few months later, Khan criticized Trump for retweeting anti-Muslim propaganda from a British far-right group and suggested British Prime Minister Theresa May shouldn't welcome Trump for a state visit.

    Trump to visit Britain

    The President is expected to visit the United Kingdom in July, according to two people familiar with the matter. The trip would conclude months of back-and-forth over when he'll visit America's closest ally.
    Trump also attacked the UK's National Health Service in February, claiming it is "going broke and not working." He accused Democrats of pushing a similar universal health care system for the United States.
    He has criticized the new location of the US Embassy in the UK capital, which moved from its long-standing site in central London to its new home south of the city in January.
    "We had the best site in all of London," Trump said last month, before adding that now, "We have an embassy in a lousy location."

    Original Article : HERE ; This post was curated & posted using : RealSpecific

    =>
    ***********************************************
    Read More Here: Trump says London hospital is like ‘a war zone’ from knife attacks
    ************************************
    =>

    Sponsored by AMA News 

    =>

    This article was searched, compiled, delivered and presented using  RSS Masher  & TrendingTraffic  

    =>>


    Trump says London hospital is like ‘a war zone’ from knife attacks was originally posted by Viral News 2

    Following a Tuna from Fiji to Brooklynon the Blockchain

    The young Americans trying to stop Ireland from voting Yes to abortion

    Dublin (CNN)Emily Faulkner is in central Dublin, handing out leaflets featuring fetuses in various stages of development, when she's pelted by an egg.

    "Did you get that on tape? Is it on, babe? Turn it on," she says.
    As Faulkner wipes the mess from her face, a fellow anti-abortion campaigner approaches her, saying she'll be calling the police to have a look.
    "Ok," Faulkner says with a smile. "I'm excited."
    With just days until Ireland votes in a referendum on whether to repeal the Eighth Amendment to the constitution -- which places the right to life of an unborn child on equal footing with that of the mother -- campaigners have become increasingly confrontational in their tactics.
    If a majority vote Yes on Friday, Ireland is expected to enact legislation that will allow for terminations up to 12 weeks into a pregnancy. A No vote would keep the country's abortion laws -- some of the most restrictive in the developed world -- in place.
    But not all of those targeting voters with leaflets, placards and social media posts are Irish.
    Emily
      Faulkner, 23, and Berning, 25, are founders of the Colorado-based anti-abortion group Let Them Live. They've travelled to Ireland for the month leading up to the historic poll to "sway the voters to vote pro-life and hopefully keep Ireland pro-life."
      "Basically it's a Roe v. Wade, but Irish style," Faulkner told a group of American students she was attempting to recruit for the journey, referring to the landmark 1970s court case that made it legal for women across the United States to have abortions.
      When the couple (both associated with the US-based conservative nonprofit The Leadership Institute) launched a $10,000 crowdfunding campaign to finance the trip, they had written they'd be volunteering with Ireland's Pro Life Campaign. But after they experienced an "unexpected" backlash from Irish pro-repeal groups, who said they weren't welcome and threatened to report them to immigration, they changed that description, removing any mention of joining the campaign in an official capacity.
      "We were deathly afraid we were going to get turned away at the gate," says Berning, and "wanting to make sure that people didn't feel threatened by us coming."
      Groups dedicated to repealing the Eighth Amendment described the couple's tactics as deceptive.
      Faulkner said she and Berning arrived at Dublin airport in early May and told immigration officers they "had no specific plans for the trip other than documenting" the campaign. Once they were let through the airport gates, the pair began to mobilize, designing canvassing materials they described as "information outreach" that another member would carry to Ireland from the US.
        The members of Let Them Live are not the only Americans supporting the anti-abortion movement here.
        One branch of the national pro-repeal group Together for Yes told CNN its members have heard American accents on their doorsteps. LoveBoth, a prominent "No" campaign group, brought over the American activist and "abortion survivor" Claire Culwell to speak at its rallies across the country in April.
        Faulkner
        That's a sore subject for the members of Let Them Live, who had been hoping to work in a more official capacity with the No campaign.
        "I think there's just a paranoia," Berning explained of the reasons why No campaigners didn't want to get involved with his group. "They don't want to break any rules. For us, it sucks because we want to help them, but for them, they're being smart ... maybe."
        Under Irish law, foreign citizens and groups are not allowed to make any financial donations to Irish campaign groups. However, it is unclear if Let Them Live would have been allowed to campaign officially with the No campaign in a voluntary capacity.
        Although the Irish government states that "you need a Volunteer Visa to come to Ireland to do voluntary work, eg for a charity, non-profit or voluntary organisation," data obtained by CNN shows that no Americans are currently on those visas. Ireland's Department of Justice and Equality told CNN "volunteering 'per se' is not prohibited by law for those in Ireland on valid holiday visas."
        Nathan
          Some Irish are outraged by foreign groups like Let Them Live, arguing that American campaigners are using their vacations to stage a proxy war on women's rights in their country.
          MΓ‘ireΓ‘d Enright, an Irish abortion rights campaigner and senior lecturer in law at the University of Birmingham in England, is more skeptical of their reach.
          "I don't have a legal objection to it but it strikes me as a poor educational experience," she said.
          "I would wonder about how they justify it -- whether they justify it as a human rights campaign or whether they are justifying it as a free trip to the 'old country' in which they will engage in politics that I would imagine they would have very little direct personal understanding of."
          "Personal engagement on a local level has always been crucial to Irish politics, so that kind of butting in is very difficult to do effectively. So the idea that a foreign group would think they would have much of an impact in the way of direct canvassing strikes me as terribly naive."
          On an overcast morning, the Americans huddled in prayer outside a city council building.
            They were there to attend and film an abortion rights campaign event.
            Berning
            Inside, members of Let Them Live filed into front seats, where they listened to a panel of abortion rights activists speak about the harm they believe the Eighth Amendment causes to women.
            Ireland's Health Minister warned about a "fog" of misinformation being used to "conflate" and "confuse" voters. A video played, featuring parents of a pregnant woman who traveled for a termination after being told her baby wouldn't survive outside the womb. They appealed for compassion.
            "You cannot judge people's actions and say you have the solutions," the woman in the video said.
            As the event wrapped up, Berning exchanged his video camera for a packet of Let Them Live flyers. He laid them out on the panelists' table as one of the group's members, Benyam Capel, was asked to stop filming with a concealed palm-size camera.
            They regrouped outside, where Faulkner and other members began to distribute flyers to passersby until building security informed them that leafleting on city council grounds was prohibited.
            Berning questioned that.
            "Oh, that wouldn't be true, because they have the constitutional right to freedom of speech," he said.
            But laws in Ireland differ greatly from those in the US. And for some Irish, who fear foreign influence on their political process, it is this attitude that is worrisome.
            The self-described "pro-life warriors" then took to a central Dublin street, where their flyers were met with mixed reactions, perhaps an indication of the latest voter intentions. Recent polls suggest the Yes campaign is ahead, but only slightly.
            Berning handed a flyer to a woman who was walking briskly through the street with her partner. After glimpsing at the flyer, she then paused before ripping it up slowly.
            The group was also met with more positive responses, including a mother who politely smiled as she explained she already understood the various stages of embryonic development. Another man told them he wasn't interested in flyers but would be voting No because he didn't trust politicians.
            Then there were those who were upset to learn the group were not Irish.
            Chase
            "It's a little bit curious because what you've got here are other people coming and interfering here," said George H. 23, who asked for his last name to be withheld. "It seems odd on the surface because it's an Irish constitutional issue."
            "It feels like Russia and America and Donald Trump -- and that wasn't wanted. Is this wanted [here]? Its slightly off, if you know what I mean."
            Ireland's referendum is taking place in the wake of the Cambridge Analytica revelations, the Brexit "Vote Leave" finance scandal and continued fallout surrounding alleged Russian interference in the 2016 US election.
            Irish politicians are struggling to come to terms with the far-reaching impact social media can have on elections, while real-time indicators of foreign interference have sparked fears among transparency groups that Ireland could also be vulnerable to a similar fate as its neighbors to the east and west.
            Although Irish law bans foreign donations to campaigns, regulations around foreign advertising online don't exist. This effectively leaves Facebook, Google and Google-owned YouTube as prime campaigning grounds for anyone wishing to run an ad, regardless of location.
            Irish lawmaker James Lawless first put forward a Social Media Transparency Bill in December 2017, with the aim to reduce the risk of foreign actors influencing upcoming campaigns. The bill was rejected last year, but it's now being reconsidered as the decisions of the two American tech giants have brought international attention to Ireland's electoral integrity.
            In early May, Facebook said it would ban foreign-bought ads related to the vote, while Google paused all ads related to the referendum.
            Pro-repeal groups applauded the decision, saying it would level the playing field.
            Anti-abortion groups said the move was evidence of a "rigged" election and a clampdown on free speech that would effectively "silence" their campaign.
            Berning
            Berning, who runs a tech startup and worked on former US presidential candidate Ben Carson's campaign, told CNN that Let them Live's Facebook page had been "unfairly" banned from posting material targeting an Irish audience, although a "few have slipped through."
            And those loopholes are popping up across the platform.
            The Transparency Referendum Initiative (TRI), a volunteer organization set up to monitor social media posts about the referendum, found at least 31% of new ads captured in the week after Facebook's announcement were administered at least in part by page managers outside Ireland, with a disproportionate amount of them connected to the No campaign.
            Meanwhile, some US-based anti-abortion groups have been able to continue running ads on their Facebook pages that have targeted Irish voters directly.
            One of them, the controversial New York-based Expectant Mother Care (EMC) FrontLine Pregnancy Centers, ran at least 10 anti-abortion ads targeting Irish voters following Facebook's announcement. Its founder is currently visiting Ireland in the lead-up to the vote.
            While that battle continues to rage online, the Let Them Live members are hoping their efforts on the ground can help sway voters.
            A confident Berning held a handful of flyers as he walked down a riverside promenade flanked with Yes and No campaign posters.
            "Turns out nothing we were originally planning on doing was illegal at all," he said, adding that the group's plan for the final days of campaigning was to canvass highways and town centers with 5,000 posters they had printed in Ireland.
            "It'll kind of be like if we're promoting a concert!" Faulkner said.
            The posters, which feature a picture of a fetus at 12 weeks, read "Say NO to abortion on demand."
            "It doesn't say 'vote No' or 'vote Yes,'" she added.

            Original Article : HERE ; This post was curated & posted using : RealSpecific

            =>
            ***********************************************
            Learn More Here: The young Americans trying to stop Ireland from voting Yes to abortion
            ************************************
            =>

            Sponsored by  SmartQuotes - Your daily smart quote 

            =>

            This article was searched, compiled, delivered and presented using  RSS Masher  & TrendingTraffic  

            =>>


            The young Americans trying to stop Ireland from voting Yes to abortion was originally posted by Viral News 2

            Ireland votes by landslide to legalise abortion

            Sunday, May 27, 2018

            A judge sides with parents and rules their 30-year-old son must move out

            (CNN)A 30-year-old man didn't get the message that it was time to move out of his parents' home, even after they left him five notices and an offer of cash to help find new digs.

            But Rotondo contends he is owed a six-month notice.
            Rotondo told CNN's sister network HLN on Wednesday that he would love to leave as soon as possible -- "I don't like living there" -- but he was not able to do so immediately.
              "I'm getting together the means to do that," he said. "With my parents, they want me out right away, and they're not really interested in providing reasonable time, and the court is siding with them, as it seems."

              Notices sent to their son

              Christina and Mark Rotondo of Camillus started the court proceedings earlier this month and filed evidence of five notices they served their son, starting in February.
              One note on February 2 reads:
              "After a discussion with your Mother, we have decided you must leave this house immediately. You have 14 days to vacate. You will not be allowed to return. We will take whatever actions are necessary to enforce this decision."
              Shortly after this notice, his parents decided to seek legal counsel and served another notice on February 13, granting Michael 30 days to move out or they would begin enforcement procedures.
              Five days later, in another note, the parents offered some advice and gifted Michael $1,100 to help him find a new place to live.
              "Some advice:
              1) Organize the things you need for work and to manage an apartment. Note: You will need stuff at (redacted). You must arrange the date and time through your Father so he can set it up with the tenant.
              2) Sell the other things you have that have any significant value, (e.g. stereo, some tools etc.). This is especially true for any weapons you may have. You need the money and will have no place for the stuff.
              3) There are jobs available even for those with a poor work history like you. Get one - you have to work!
              4) If you want help finding a place your Mother has offered to help you."
              Michael still didn't heed the notice that it was time to move on, and according to a note dated March 5 his parents reminded him of the looming deadline of March 15, documents show.
              "So far we have seen no indication that you are preparing to leave." It adds, "Be aware that we will take any appropriate actions necessary to make sure you leave the house as demanded."
              The fifth and final notice on March 30 presents Michael some options to get his broken down vehicle off their property, and in all the options his parents offer to help pay for the repairs.
              Since he still refused to leave, his parents filed for an ejectment proceeding to end what some might call a failure to launch.
              Michael asked the court to dismiss the request.
              He claimed that for the past eight years he "has never been expected to contribute to household expenses, or assisted with chores and the maintenance of the premises, and claims that this is simply a component of his living agreement," according to filings obtained by CNN affiliate WSTM.

              Judge: 'I think the notice is sufficient'

              During the hearing on Tuesday, Michael represented himself and cited the case of Kosa v. Legg: "that there is 'Common law requirement of six-month notice to quit before tenant may be removed through ejectment action."
              ButNew York State Supreme Court Judge Donald Greenwood disagreed.
              "I'm granting the eviction," he said. "I think the notice is sufficient."
              After court, Rotondo told reporters he plans to appeal the case and finds the ruling "ridiculous."
              "It seems to me like I should be provided with, you know, 30 days or so, because generally you get 30 days after you're found, you know, to have to vacate the premises," he said. "So I'm expecting something like that. But realistically, if that's not the case, I don't know."
              Rotondo told HLN he did not know why his parents have pushed for him to leave so quickly. Things became adversarial, he said, and their relationship has suffered.
              "I don't really hope to reconcile. I really just want to get out of the situation," he said.
              He said he expects to be able to leave within three months, which "ironically" would be six months from that first February notice.

              Original Article : HERE ; This post was curated & posted using : RealSpecific

              =>
              ***********************************************
              Learn More Here: A judge sides with parents and rules their 30-year-old son must move out
              ************************************
              =>

              Sponsored by  SmartQuotes - Your daily smart quote 

              =>

              This article was searched, compiled, delivered and presented using  RSS Masher  & TrendingTraffic  

              =>>


              A judge sides with parents and rules their 30-year-old son must move out was originally posted by Viral News 2

              How white women use strategic tears to avoid accountability | Ruby Hamad

              John Legend nailed why calling MS-13 gang members ‘animals’ is a problem.

              President Trump referred to people as "animals" — and then doubled down, saying that he was only referring to certain people.

              Trump's comment came during a roundtable discussion about sanctuary cities in California, after Fresno County Sheriff Margaret Mims described what she sees as a problem with current law enforcement and immigration policy.

              Trump replied, "We have people coming into the country, or trying to come in — and we're stopping a lot of them — but we're taking people out of the country. You wouldn't believe how bad these people are. These aren't people. These are animals."

              Many honed in on the president's words, accusing him of dehumanizing all undocumented immigrants from south of the border. The president clarified that he was specifically referring to those in MS-13 — gang members mostly from Central America, notorious for particularly brutal, violent crimes.

              I.C.E. agents detain a suspected MS-13 gang member and Honduran immigrant. Photo by John Moore/Getty Images.

              John Legend beautifully explained why it doesn't matter if the president was only dehumanizing violent gang members.

              When Trump made these remarks, Legend and his wife, Chrissy Teigen, were in the hospital welcoming their new baby. Yet the singer still took a moment to explain why dehumanizing any group — even violent gang members — is problematic.  

              "I'm in the hospital with our new son," he wrote on Twitter. "Any of these babies here could end up committing terrible crimes in the future. It's easy, once they've done so, to distance ourselves from their humanity."

              Image via John Legend/Twitter.

              ‌‌The perspective one gets gazing at a brand-new human being, still unmarked by the world, is as about as pure as it gets.

              Legend challenged us all to examine the root causes of violence and look for collective solutions.

              "But it's much more honest and challenging to realize they were all babies once and think about what in society, their home life, etc. took them from baby to violent gang member," he continued, "and then to think about collective action we could take to mitigate these conditions."

              He also noted our duty to examine the role U.S. policy may have played in the formation of MS-13 in the first place.

              Image via John Legend/Twitter.

              It's easy to create black-and-white, us-versus-them, good-versus-evil narratives.

              It's harder to dig deep into what leads people to violence and contemplate how we could play a role in preventing it.

              Photo by Jason Merritt/Getty Images.

              Without devolving into personal bashing, Legend pointed out a universal truth: As history has proven time and again, dehumanization of any group of people is a dangerous path.

              Image via John Legend/Twitter.

              What makes his comments so compelling is that he put forth his arguments and challenges ideas with a thoughtful nod to the complexity of the issue — and without disparaging anyone's ideology, political affiliation, or appearance.

              Thank you, John Legend, for a refreshing example of how to engage in thoughtful and reasonable discourse, even within an undeniably divisive topic.

              Original Article : HERE ; This post was curated & posted using : RealSpecific

              =>
              ***********************************************
              Post Source Here: John Legend nailed why calling MS-13 gang members ‘animals’ is a problem.
              ************************************
              =>

              Sponsored by  FreePLRArticles.biz 

              =>

              This article was searched, compiled, delivered and presented using  RSS Masher  & TrendingTraffic  

              =>>


              John Legend nailed why calling MS-13 gang members ‘animals’ is a problem. was originally posted by Viral News 2

              25+ Epic Clothing Disasters We Cant Believe Actually Happened (New Pics)

              Michael Cohen Took Cash From Russian Oligarch After Election

              Saturday, May 26, 2018

              This woman was fat-shamed on a flight. But her story has a happy ending.

              On May 14, one of Savannah Phillips' most dreaded flying fears came to life.  

              "I’m not the biggest person on the airplane, but I’m not the smallest," Phillips explained in a Facebook post. "My worst nightmare is someone being uncomfortable because they have to sit next to me."

              Fearful of the harassment and even threats people with bigger bodies can face while flying, Phillips usually tries to buy a seat where she's not sitting next to another passenger.

              But on a flight from Oklahoma to Chicago, Phillips was assigned a seat at the gate and wasn't able to sit alone. Unfortunately, the man who ended up next to her embodied the very worst.

              "I can't believe this, I'm sitting next to a smelly fatty."

              Those were the words the stranger, an older man who claimed to be a comedian, texted someone else — while sitting right next to Phillips on the plane. A setting on the man's phone enlarged the text, according to Phillips, and the screen's brightness was turned all the way up.

              It was unmistakably about her.

              GIF via News Channel 5/YouTube.

              The nasty comment immediately brought Phillips to tears.

              "I don’t even know what the rest of his text said," she wrote in her post. "I turned my head away as fast as I could. I was shocked and it was like confirmation of the negative things I think about myself on a daily basis."

              Phillips continued:

              "Before I knew it, I could feel hot, salty tears coming down my face. I sat and cried silently, hoping this guy didn’t try to make small talk, because I didn’t trust how I would react and I didn’t want to get kicked off the plane. I was so hurt. The pilot came over head and said there would be a 30-minute delay before he could take off — great. Just more time I would have to sit next to this creep."

              Fortunately, that's when things took a turn for the (much, much) better.

              Fellow passenger Chase Irwin sitting nearby had spotted the incredibly hurtful text and decided to step in.

              He couldn't believe what he was witnessing.

              "I actually got really sick to my stomach," Irwin explained to News Channel 5.

              Irwin tapped the "comedian" on the shoulder and demanded he change seats with him, according to Phillips. The "comedian" agreed to switch, but then asked why.

              Irwin did not hold back. "I said, 'because you're a heartless person,'" Irwin recalled. "I read your text, and the girl next to you crying also read your text. And you should really take into consideration other people's feelings.'"

              I am only sharing this story of what happened to me today in hopes that the person who stuck up for me will somehow be...

              Posted by Savannah Phillips on Monday, May 14, 2018

              Phillips and Irwin got along great, chatting about their families and jobs on the flight to Chicago. The flight attendant, who learned about what happened, kept trying to give Irwin free drinks and said that he was her hero, according to Phillips.

              "He wasn’t her hero," Phillips wrote. "He was mine."

              Fortunately, Phillips' story had a happy ending. But for passengers with bigger bodies, that's not always the case.

              "Flying while fat" can truly be a daunting affair. There's the staring, the rude comments — not to mention navigating a patchwork of guidelines that complicate purchasing a ticket for an increasingly small seat on a plane.

              But as Irwin showed, employing some basic empathy for your fellow passengers can go a long way. We should all keep that in mind when we travel.

              Watch News Channel 5's segment on Phillips' story below:

              Original Article : HERE ; This post was curated & posted using : RealSpecific

              =>
              ***********************************************
              Read More Here: This woman was fat-shamed on a flight. But her story has a happy ending.
              ************************************
              =>

              Sponsored by AMA News 

              =>

              This article was searched, compiled, delivered and presented using  RSS Masher  & TrendingTraffic  

              =>>


              This woman was fat-shamed on a flight. But her story has a happy ending. was originally posted by Viral News 2